<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Praise of Anti-Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.meadowsonline.com/2009/11/14/in-praise-of-anti-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.meadowsonline.com/2009/11/14/in-praise-of-anti-social-media/</link>
	<description>A Different View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:52:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://blog.meadowsonline.com/2009/11/14/in-praise-of-anti-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meadowsonline.com/?p=382#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments! Valerie when I read Chris&#039;s post in combination with the comments I was sensing sort of an alarming universality in the approach to content; perhaps some readers were taking his idea too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments! Valerie when I read Chris&#8217;s post in combination with the comments I was sensing sort of an alarming universality in the approach to content; perhaps some readers were taking his idea too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie</title>
		<link>http://blog.meadowsonline.com/2009/11/14/in-praise-of-anti-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meadowsonline.com/?p=382#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Excellent points, but I was getting the idea that Brogan was addressing the hugs-don&#039;t-feed-my-kids department of social media and his deep inherent affection for people. I think both of you (and me) exist under one social media umbrella. Because again, social media is a tool with as many different uses as there are people to use them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points, but I was getting the idea that Brogan was addressing the hugs-don&#8217;t-feed-my-kids department of social media and his deep inherent affection for people. I think both of you (and me) exist under one social media umbrella. Because again, social media is a tool with as many different uses as there are people to use them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://blog.meadowsonline.com/2009/11/14/in-praise-of-anti-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 16:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.meadowsonline.com/?p=382#comment-171</guid>
		<description>I agree. I think there&#039;s an amazing way to think with social media, being challenged by your peers, and then there&#039;s the rather sad way: counting hits or followers and constructing content and responses purely to garner more. I know many people who engaged in creative projects just because that&#039;s what the cool kids were doing and they wanted in with the cool kids. Imagine: writing long works of fiction with the sole purpose of using it to engage with (the highly-prized) others.

That&#039;s kind of sad, now that I write it out like that. Are we so in need of peers that we&#039;re willing to go that far? I guess we are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I think there&#8217;s an amazing way to think with social media, being challenged by your peers, and then there&#8217;s the rather sad way: counting hits or followers and constructing content and responses purely to garner more. I know many people who engaged in creative projects just because that&#8217;s what the cool kids were doing and they wanted in with the cool kids. Imagine: writing long works of fiction with the sole purpose of using it to engage with (the highly-prized) others.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s kind of sad, now that I write it out like that. Are we so in need of peers that we&#8217;re willing to go that far? I guess we are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
